Legal Opinion

White v. Spaulding

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 1883PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Certiorari to Alpena. (Hart, J.) Prooeedin&s to remove an administrator. The administrator brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.

This case comes before us on certiorari to review proceedings which have been had in the probate court for the county of Alpena, and afterwards in the circuit court on appeal, to remove the respondent from the office of administrator of the estate of William White deceased, and which resulted in an order for his removal.

Without going into the evidence in the case, which is set out in full in the record, it will be sufficient for our purposes to state the facts as they appeared of record in the probate court at the time the administrator was called upon co make answer to the charges against…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Brown v. ForscheMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Sperry v. Estate of MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Pace v. OppenheimIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
  4. Gratacap v. PhyfeNew York Court of Chancery · 1846
  5. In re the Estate of GodfreyMichigan Supreme Court · 1856

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In re Berner's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. BradleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. GouldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1884
  4. Knight v. HamakarOregon Supreme Court · 1901
  5. In re the Probate of the Will of MousseauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API