Legal Opinion

Golimowski v. Bellamy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 19, 1997PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously reversed on the law without costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in granting the petition challenging respondents’ determination that petitioner is not qualified for the position of police officer. Respondents are “afforded wide discretion in determining the fitness of candidates for appointment. Such discretion is particularly necessary in hiring police officers, to whom higher standards of fitness and character may be applied (see, Matter of Havern v Senko, 210 AD2d 480)” (Matter of Ressa v County of Nassau, 224 AD2d 534). The exercise of that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Metzger v. Nassau County Civil Service CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  2. Havern v. SenkoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. Choset v. Nassau County Civil Service CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  4. Brussel v. LoGrandeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  5. Ressa v. County of NassauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Needleman v. County of RocklandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. Winnegar v. County of SuffolkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. Opn. No., New York Attorney General Reports1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API