Legal Opinion
Eldred A. Reynolds v. Royal Mail Lines, Limited, a Corporation, and Associated-Banning Company, a Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 30, 1958No. 15676PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAMLIN, District Judge.
Plaintiff filed this action in the United States District Court, Southern District of California, Central Division, alleging that he received injuries while he was employed as a longshoreman by Associated-Banning Company, a corporation, (hereafter Associated), on board the vessel S. S. Loch Gowan in the Los Angeles Harbor area. The vessel was owned by Royal Mail Lines, Ltd., one of Appellees herein (hereafter Royal).
The complaint, invoking the jurisdiction of the Court upon the ground of diversity of citizenship, 28 U.S.C. § 1332, was in two counts. The first count…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Seas Shipping Co. v. SierackiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Read v. United States. United States Maritime Commission v. Williams Appeal of VassilopoulusCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
- Overman v. LoesserCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
- Joe Freitas v. Pacific-Atlantic Steamship Company, a Corporation, and Marine Terminals CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- The TawmieCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1936
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mladen Zivkovic v. Southern California Edison CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Salvatore Rapisardi v. United Fruit Company, and Third-Party v. Sam Barbara Co., Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- Johnny L. Boudreaux v. Sea Drilling CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Smith v. American Mail Line, Ltd.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1973
- Moore v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.