Stadelmann v. Boothroyd
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Wilson, O. J.
Plaintiffs appealed from an order denying their motion for a new trial.
Defendant sold a farm to plaintiffs by a contract for deed. They were given credit for a small farm conveyed to defendant. The balance was $27,830. On February 18, 1925, plaintiffs assumed the right to rescind and brought this action.
The alleged right to rescind rests on the claim that defendant on January 28, 1925, entered into a written lease renting the farm to one Benson for three years from March 1, 1925. It is claimed upon authority of Engel v. Mahlen, 153 Minn. 1, 189 N. W. 422, that defendant thus…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Westman v. KrumweideSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
- Skelton v. GrimmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- Mathwig v. StrandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Engel v. MahlenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- Silliman v. DobnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Miller v. SnedekerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- In Re Spencer Kellogg & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
- Raasch v. GouletNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
- Tarpy v. NowickiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- In Re Application of Berman v. KierenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.