Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Seth Thomas Clock Co. v. Board of County Commissioners

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided September 19, 1900No. 11,199PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Ebbob to the district court for Cass county. Tried below before Ramsey, J.

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

Mandamus proceedings were instituted in the district court for the purpose of requiring respondents, as county commissioners, to enter an order on the county clerk to draw a warrant in favor of relator, and to require the clerk to draw such warrant for the purpose of payment of a claim in favor of relator, theretofore allowed by said commissioners. Respondents declined to comply with the request of the relator because, as claimed by them, a warrant had already been drawn and delivered to relator’s agent aud paid, thereby constituting full payment for the *569claim so allowed. The case was tried…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Railway Co. v. McCarthySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. County of Clinton v. PaceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1895

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Union Cent. Life Ins. v. DrakeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1914
  2. Hilmer v. Western Travelers Accident Ass'nNebraska Supreme Court · 1910
  3. State ex rel Nelson v. Lincoln Medical CollegeNebraska Supreme Court · 1908
  4. C. W. Hull Co. v. WesterfieldNebraska Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Mitchell v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & EnginemenNebraska Supreme Court · 1919

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API