Legal Opinion

Franklin Invest. Co. v. American Mut. Ins. Co. of Boston

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 26, 1969No. 4559PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOOD, Chief Judge:

Appellant, a financing company, brought this action when appellee insurance company refused the claim which appellant had filed to recover for loss to a Buick automobile which it had repossessed in a damaged condition. The automobile was covered by an insurance policy issued by appellee to the purchaser of the car prior to its repossession. Because appellant held a chattel mortgage on the car at that time, it was named as “loss payee” as to losses to the vehicle. Presumably, the purchaser of the car — the named insured — was provided with a complete copy of the insurance…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wann v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  2. Connecticut General Insurance Company v. ReeseCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
  3. Blue Bonnet Life Ins. Co. v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  4. Indian Lake Estates, Inc. v. WalkerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1961
  5. Fishback v. ReevesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1895

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mark Keshishian & Sons, Inc. v. Washington Square, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Cambridge Holdings Group, Inc. v. Federal InsuranceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
  3. Peterson v. Government Employees Insurance Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Firemen's Insurance Co. of Washington v. Amerada Hess Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. Mark Keshishian & Sons, Inc. v. Washington Square, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API