Legal Opinion
First Nat. Bank v. Bonner
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 18, 1934No. Nos. 1007 and 1017PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McDERMOTT, Circuit Judge.
Equity Rule 75 (28 USCA § 723) prescribes the procedure for drawing onto the record a condensed statement of the trial proceedings. It contemplates one statement, and one only. If counsel cannot agree upon a fair condensation of the evidence, the trial eourt is empowered to direct a proper statement. This rule has been flagrantly violated here. There are six separate fragmentary statements of one trial, labeled “Supplemental Statement,” “Amendment of Narrative Statement,” “Additional and Corrective Statement,” etc. Moreover the statements contain comment, ai'gument,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In re IvesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1902
- Barber Asphalt Paying Co. v. Standard Asphalt & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Board of County Com'rs of Woods County v. State Ex Rel. Com'rs of Land OfficeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- In re BaxterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1920
- Kimmel v. CrockerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Federal Land Bank of Berkeley v. NalderCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
- Bowman v. TowerySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
- Freeman Furniture Factories, Inc. v. BowldsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943
- Lane v. Illinois Bankers Life Assur. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
- Bonner v. SuiterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.