In re the Revoke Letters Testamentary Issued to Fribourg
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
Although we find no act of dishonesty on the part of the appellant executors nor that any loss has resulted from their administration of the estate from the acts complained of, yet upon the conceded violation in two series of transactions of subdivision 7 of section 104 of the Surrogate’s Court Act, it cannot be said that the action of the surrogate in removing them constituted an improper exercise of discretion. It follows that the decree, so far as appealed from, should be affirmed, with costs.
Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.
Decree, so far as appealed from,…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Matter of DukeNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- In re the Estate of BlockNew York Surrogate's Court · 1946
- In re the Estate of IsraelNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938
- In re the Estate of SearsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1941
- DePicabia v. Chester National BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.