Meyer v. Meyer

The plaintiff and defendant were wife and husband respectively. The plaintiff obtained an interlocutory decree of divorce on the ground of the defendant’s adultery. As an incident of the divorce, the decree awarded the plaintiff eighteen thousand dollars as her share of the community property. The defendant appeals.

The defendant’s first contention is that the evidence is not sufficient to sustain the finding of adultery. It is- unnecessary to detail the evidence. Suffice it to say that its character was such as amply to sustain the finding. The defendant himself admitted conduct on his part…