Lay v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from Howard Circuit- Court. — Son. A. S. Waller, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtBroaddus, P. J.
— This suit "was instituted in Howard county, Missouri, against the appellant and the Missouri, Kansas and Texas Railroad Company. The action is to recover damages by reason of the negligence of the defendants in failing to deliver cattle on the Chicago market within a reasonable time. The damages alleged are for loss on account of decline in the market; excess shrinkage, depreciation in -value and for extra feed. ■
Before shipment, plaintiff notified the Misouri, Kansas and Texas Railroad Company that he would ship- his cattle from Burton, Howard county, Missouri, a station on its road, about…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- E. O. Stanard Milling Co. v. White Line Central Transit Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1894
- Witting v. St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1890
- Wright v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1906
- Otis Co. v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1892
- Ecton v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1907
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- McFall v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914
- Hunt v. St. Louis Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1915
- Unionville Produce Co. v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1912
- Gregory v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1913
- McDowell v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1912
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.