Plummer v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
Leroy Plummer appeals his conviction and the state cross appeals his sentence for trafficking in hydrocodone. We find no error in Issue I. As to Issue II, although the trial court erred by excluding evidence of the confidential informant’s purported threats, see Crumley v. State, 534 So.2d 909 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988), Everett v. State, 801 So.2d 189 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001), appellant failed to preserve the issue by proffering the excluded statements, Lucas v. State, 568 So.2d 18 (Fla.1990), Baker v. State, 71 So.3d 802 (Fla.2011).
We reverse appellant’s sentence, because the evidence was undisputed…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lucas v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
- Baker v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2011
- State v. CuestaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- Everett v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
- State v. DelgadoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. Kena R. MeaseDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- State of Florida v. Kristina Elaine BeamanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2025