Moore v. Monarch Distributing Co.
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dady
This is an appeal by defendant from two orders of the city court of East St. Louis denying defendant’s motion and petition to vacate a judgment by confession taken by plaintiff against defendant.
Plaintiff has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that defendant has failed to include in the concluding subdivision of the statement of the case, a brief statement of the errors relied upon for reversal, in violation of rule 39 of the Supreme Court and rule 9 of this court. Each of such rules, so far as the point in question is concerned, provides that ‘ ‘ The concluding subdivision of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Schwartz v. SchwartzIllinois Supreme Court · 1937
- French v. WillerIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
- Humphreys v. MatthewsIllinois Supreme Court · 1850
- Ross v. Wrightwood-Hampden Building Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1933
- Young v. CooperIllinois Supreme Court · 1871
3Cited by4 opinions
- Pirie v. CarrollAppellate Court of Illinois · 1960
- Snook v. ShawAppellate Court of Illinois · 1942
- Eaton v. ShieldsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1959
- Moore v. Monarch Distributing Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1943