Legal Opinion

Rohlik v. Commissioner of Public Safety

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided February 17, 1987No. CX-86-1167PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

Respondent Brian Rohlik’s driver’s license was revoked for driving with an alcohol concentration over .10. The trial court rescinded the revocation. On appeal the Commissioner argues that the trial court erred in finding the alcohol concentration test must be administered within two hours of an accident, in finding the police officer had no probable cause to believe Rohlik drove while under the influence, and in finding that the police officer did not read the implied consent advisory at the time he requested that Rohlik take the test. We reverse.

FACTS

On the evening of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Eggersgluss v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  2. Eggersgluss v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lindemann v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API