People v. Fox
New York County Courts
1Opinion of the CourtJohst P. Lomekzo, J.
Defendant contends that the subject information was defective and that there was a failure to prove beyond a reasonable doubt:
A. All of the allegations set forth in the information;
B. That defendant was operating the subject motor vehicle;
C. That defendant was physically and mentally capable of operating the motor vehicle in view of his advanced state of intoxication.
At the end of the People’s case defendant, rested and no proof was submitted in his behalf.
The defendant failed to object to the form of the information upon arraignment and before trial, and in the absence of jurisdictional…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. WeissNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
- People v. . BraschNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
- People v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- People v. BelcherNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
- People v. TaddioNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Pueblo v. Campos SuárezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1962
- People v. Dymond, New York County Courts1993
- People v. Campos SuárezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1962