Legal Opinion

Colorado Interstate Gas Co. v. Dufield

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided May 3, 1984No. 55,699PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Abbott, J.:

This is an appeal in a declaratory judgment action brought by the appellant, Colorado Interstate Gas Company (CIG), to ascertain its right to $2,666 held in escrow to cover any damages caused by CIG’s installing a pipeline across property owned by Frank E. Dufield.

The right-of-way agreement states in pertinent part:

“Grantee does hereby covenant to pay Grantor for all actual and reasonable damages incurred in the laying out, constructing, maintaining, operating, altering, replacing or removing of said pipeline, and covenants to now pay $1,000.00 as prospective damages to crops, land…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Farmers Insurance Exchange v. SchroppSupreme Court of Kansas · 1977
  2. International Petroleum Services, Inc. v. S & N Well Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1982
  3. City of Council Grove v. OssmannSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  4. Kansas Department of Health & Environment v. BanksSupreme Court of Kansas · 1981
  5. Marcotte Realty & Auction, Inc. v. SchumacherSupreme Court of Kansas · 1981

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Smith v. State ex rel. New Mexico Department of Parks & RecreationNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Bank of America, N.A. v. NarulaCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2011
  3. Hill & Company, Inc. v. O'MALLEYCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1991
  4. Hill v. Walden (In re walden)District Court, D. Colorado · 1997
  5. Lisbon v. Heatcraft, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API