Legal Opinion

State v. M.H.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 20, 1990No. 90-511PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIAMANTIS, Judge.

The state appeals the order of the trial court granting defendant’s motion for a new trial.1 We conclude that defendant failed to sustain the burden of proving his right to a new trial and, therefore, reverse.

The state filed a petition of delinquency against defendant, M.H., charging him with the sale and delivery of cannabis. Defendant, a high school student, was charged with selling a bag of cannabis to another student during school hours. The matter proceeded to trial, non-jury. Based upon the evidence presented, the trial court found defendant guilty as charged.

After the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Clark v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
  2. Thomas v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
  3. Harvey v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
  4. R.A.S. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cammarano v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  2. Newkirk v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API