Legal Opinion

Weil v. Kreutzer

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided September 29, 1909PublishedCited by 22 opinions

CASE 69. — ACTION BY GEORGE KREUTZER AGAINST JESSE WEIL FOR DAMAGES FOR PERSONAL INJURIES. Appeal from. McCracken Circuit Court. Judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. —

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

Judge Barker

— Affirming.

The appellant, Jesse Weil, while propelling his automobile along Kentucky avenue, in the city of Paducah, collided with the appellee, George Kreutzer, who was walking across the street, inflicting upon his body severe injuries. To'recover damages for the injuries so inflicted Kreutzer instituted this action, alleging in his petition that the collision and resulting injury were occasioned by the negligence of the appellant, Jesse Weil. To this action the defendant (appellant) filed an answer controverting the material allegations of the petition,…

2Cited by22 opinions

  1. Southern Cotton Oil Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1920
  2. O'Dowd v. NewnhamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
  3. Ulmer v. PistoleMississippi Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Fullenwider v. BrawnerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  5. Winchester v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API