People v. Roselle
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Mendocino County and from an order denying a new trial. J. Q. White, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
Upon an information charging defendant with murder for the killing of one Erick Nilsen, the jury returned a verdict as follows: “We, the jury, find the defendant guilty of manslaughter, and we strongly recommend him to the mercy of the court.” Before judgment, defendant made application for a new trial, which being denied, judgment.was pronounced, and an appeal taken from both the order and judgment.
We quote from appellant’s brief: “Three propositions are advanced by appellant, demanding a reversal herein: First, we contend that there is no evidence in the record to sustain the verdict and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. Lee GamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- People v. ChavezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- People v. ShermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. BradfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Hasson v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1982
- People v. LongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- People v. BradfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.