Legal Opinion

Torrence v. Strong

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1870PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Multnomah County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Thayer, J.:

This is an appeal from a judgment recovered in the Circuit Court, Multnomah County. It was an action to recover money. The plaintiff, John Torrence, alleged in his complaint that Amory Holbrook died intestate on the 26th day of September, 1866, and that William Strong was, on the 1st day of October, 1866, duly appointed his administrator and had duly qualified, etc., and as such administrator was made defendant.

It was also alleged that on the 30th day of November, 1858, in the lifetime of said Holbrook, the plaintiff retained and employed him, as his general attorney,…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Shmit v. DayOregon Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Skelton v. NewbergOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Holmes v. CrooksNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Miller v. CunninghamOregon Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Patrick v. McManusSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API