Wood v. Mobley
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Eberhardt, Judge.
Only Headnote 1 requires comment. It has been urged that a different result is required by the provisions of the Appellate Practice Act of 1965, as amended (Ga. L. 1965, p. 18; Ga. L. 1966, p. 493). We do not agree. It is provided in the amendment of 1966 that a “Motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict need not be filed as a condition precedent to review upon appeal of an order or ruling of the trial court overruling a motion for directed verdict, but in all cases where such motion is an available remedy, the party may file the motion, or appeal directly from the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kelly v. Strouse & Bros.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Texas Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- City of Valdosta v. SingletonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
- Fulton County v. SpratlinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1954
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State Highway Department v. HicksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967