Legal Opinion

Wood v. Mobley

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 15, 1966No. 41790PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Eberhardt, Judge.

Only Headnote 1 requires comment. It has been urged that a different result is required by the provisions of the Appellate Practice Act of 1965, as amended (Ga. L. 1965, p. 18; Ga. L. 1966, p. 493). We do not agree. It is provided in the amendment of 1966 that a “Motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict need not be filed as a condition precedent to review upon appeal of an order or ruling of the trial court overruling a motion for directed verdict, but in all cases where such motion is an available remedy, the party may file the motion, or appeal directly from the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kelly v. Strouse & Bros.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Texas Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. City of Valdosta v. SingletonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  4. Fulton County v. SpratlinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1954
  5. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State Highway Department v. HicksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API