Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. DePasquale

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 21, 1985PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*185OPINION OF THE COURT

LARSEN, Justice.

In this case we are asked to define the limits of a municipality’s power to detect and cite drivers who violate posted speed limits. While we recognize the public safety considerations which render speed detection an important part of a police department’s duties, we are also mindful of the potential for abuse to the drivers of this Commonwealth which can arise from overly zealous enforcement of the speed limit laws, made evermore simple through the use of modern speed timing devices.

On November 17, 1981, appellant Guy J. DePasquale was convicted by a judge…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Uniontown Area School District v. Pennsylvania Human Relations CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Callery v. Blythe Township Municipal AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  4. Girard School District v. PittengerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Commonwealth v. DePasqualeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Borough of Pottstown v. Pennsylvania Municipal Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Commonwealth v. WilsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Snizaski v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Commonwealth v. DeFuscoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. In re C.J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API