C. L. Colman Lumber Co. v. Mironowski
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
In this action to foreclose a lien for building materials furnished by plaintiff and used by defendants in the erection of a dwelling house, the findings were for plaintiff. Without a motion for amended findings or a new trial, defendants appeal from the judgment.
The record and briefs present nothing but issues of fact. There is no question of the quantity of materials actually delivered to and used by the defendants. The evidence is ample to support the finding as to their reasonable value. Back of that is the issue as to whether they were sold upon express contract. There also the finding…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Webster Lumber Co. v. RoedterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
3Cited by3 opinions
- Schmitt v. Eagle Roller Mill Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- Nitkey v. WardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- Freyberg v. London & Scottish Assurance Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956