Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ayala v. Minniti

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided August 7, 1986No. 01-86-0248-CVPublished

1DissentHoyt, Justice

I respectfully dissent. The majority holds that section 11.11(d) of the Texas Family Code authorizes the trial court to dispense with the necessity of a bond in connection with temporary orders affecting a child. Section 11.11 provides in relevant part:(a) In a suit affecting the parent-child relationship, the court may make any temporary order for the safety and welfare of the child, including but not limited to an order:(1) for the temporary conservatorship of the child;(2) for temporary support of the child;(3) restraining any party from molesting or disturbing the peace of the child or…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lancaster v. LancasterTexas Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Williams v. City of Tom Bean, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1985
  3. Evans Division-Royal Industries v. JeffriesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API