Legal Opinion

Cornelius v. Reiser

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided March 18, 1892Published

Motion for reargument or for leave to appeal to the court of appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

nothing in the case or the points of the appellant was overlooked when this appeal was decided, and the decision is not in conflict with any case or statute. The moving papers fail, therefore, to show a ground for reargument under the rules. Curley v. Tomlinson, 5 Daly, 283. There is no question for submission to the court of appeals. The law governing the case is well settled. The only contention between the parties is whether there was evidence of authority from defendant to his bar-keeper to incur the expense of washing towels for the saloon, and whether the hitter’s wife, who…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Curley v. TomlinsonNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1874
  2. Clapp v. GravesNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1858

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API