Minnesota Fire & Casualty Co. v. Greenfield
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the CourtKlein, J.
¶ 1 Appellant Minnesota Fire and Casualty Company (“Minnesota”), in this declaratory judgment action, appeals the trial court’s March 14, 2001, order declaring that Minnesota owed a duty to defend and potentially indemnify Greenfield. We reverse.
¶2 Michael Greenfield voluntarily and intentionally provided heroin, in a bag labeled “suicide”, to Angela Smith. Angela Smith voluntarily and intentionally used *624that heroin and died as a result. Angela Smith’s parents, Sharon L. Smith and Ar-lin C. Smith, individually and as administrators of the estate of Angela C. Smith (“Smith”), filed a wrongful…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mutual Benefit Insurance v. HaverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Stidham v. Millvale Sportsmen's ClubSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Kraus v. TaylorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Scopel v. Donegal Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Eisenman v. HORNBERGERSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Minnesota Fire & Casualty Co. v. GreenfieldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Commonwealth v. KakhankhamSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Erie Insurance Exchange v. MuffSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- American Rehabilitation & Physical Therapy, Inc. v. American Motorists InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Titan Indemnity Co. v. CameronCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.