Legal Opinion

In Re Marriage of Caby

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 27, 1992No. 17707PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROW, Judge.

Arthur Wallace Caby (“Arthur”) moved the trial court to “set aside” a garnishment for child support allegedly owed his putative ex-wife, Darlene Patricia Caby (“Darlene”), and to declare invalid the amount of child support arrearage calculated by the Division of Child Support Enforcement (“DCSE”) of the Missouri Department of Social Services. The trial court, in a judgment containing meticulous findings of fact, denied relief. Arthur appeals. We synopsize only the facts pertinent to his assignments of error. 1

On February 13, 1971, Arthur and Darlene ostensibly married each other.…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Lincoln Credit Co. v. PeachSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  2. Prueliage v. De Seaton CorporationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
  3. Hastings v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. La Presto v. La PrestoSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  5. Jefferson City Bridge & Transit Co. v. BlaserSupreme Court of Missouri · 1927

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Gaunt v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Brandt v. CsakiMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Bland v. IMCO Recycling, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. State v. DaleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Guzzardo v. City Group, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API