Legal Opinion
Kirchner v. Laughlin
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided January 6, 1892No. 434PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Appeal, from a judgment in favor of plaintiff, from the First Judicial District Court, Santa Fe County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtO’Brien, C. J.
On the ninth day of August, 1879, the plaintiff, August Kirchner, a resident of Santa Fe county, in this territory, claims to have entered into a written contract with the defendant, Saron N. Laughlin, a resident of California, and one Joseph H. Wiley, of the tenor following, to wit:
“These presents witness that, whereas, August Kirchner agrees to intrust and deliver to Joseph H. Wiley, of Santa Fe county, New Mexico, and Saron N. Laughlin, of California, two thousand ewes, upon the terms hereinafter stated, the said Joseph H. Wiley and Saron N. Laughlin agree and undertake to receive and hold…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Burton v. DriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Adams v. FrothinghamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1807
- Turner v. YatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
- Brown v. WoodSupreme Court of Missouri · 1854
- Mauri v. HeffernanNew York Supreme Court · 1816
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Moreno v. FloydNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
- State v. HansonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015
- Lopez v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1955
- State v. HansonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015