Legal Opinion

Samuel Dunkel & Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided December 6, 1944No. C. D. 899PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WalKbe, Judge:

This protest is directed against the refusal of the collector of customs at the port of New York to allow drawback on certain tinned butter claimed to have been manufactured or produced in the United States with the use of imported merchandise, to wit, bulk butter from the Argentine. Section 313 (a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, under which the claim is made, reads in part as follows:

SEC. 313. DRAWBACK AND REFUNDS.(a) Articles Made from Imported Merchandise. — Upon the exportation of articles manufactured or produced in the United States with the use of imported merchandise, the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hartranft v. WiegmannSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Anheuser-Busch Brewing Assn. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Diamond Tool Research Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  2. Protest 107820-K of Samuel Dunkel & Co.United States Customs Court · 1944
  3. Protest 97780-K of Lanco Products Co.United States Customs Court · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API