Legal Opinion

State v. McConnell

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 1, 1894PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Poweshiek District Court. — Hon. A. R. Dewey, Judge. Indictment for liquor nuisance. Verdict for defendant by direction of the court. The state appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtKinne, J.

I. Defendant was indicted for a liquor nuisance, pleaded not guilty, and at the close of the state’s evidence, and on the defendant’s motion, the court directed a verdict for defendant. Defendant was a member of a firm composed of three persons, viz.: H. K. Snider, Dr. E. W. Clark and himself. This firm was operating a drug store in the city of Grinned, and the sales of liquors complained of were made in 'said store, either by defendant or by a clerk employed by the firm. H. K. Snider was a registered pharmacist, and held a permit to sell intoxicating liquors in said *198store during the time…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. FlemingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1892

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. McLean v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919
  2. State v. LundgrenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  3. Walters v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
  4. State v. GregorySupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  5. State v. O'MalleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1906

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API