General Security Insurance v. Reliance Insurance
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
General Security Insurance Company (“General Security”), an excess insurance provider, sued both Reliance Insurance Company (“Reliance”) and Continental Insurance Company (“Continental”) for contribution after General Security paid nearly $2 million to the victim of a tractor-trailer crash. The victim, an employee of Sequoyah Trucking (“Sequoyah”), drove a rig that included a trailer Sequoyah rented from J.T. McKinney Co. (“McKinney”). General Security filed separate suits claiming that both Rebanee and Continental insured the trailer portion of the rig. On cross motions for…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wildman v. Government Employees Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1957
- John Deere Insurance Company v. Guillermo NuevaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Ulwelling v. Crown Coach Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1962
- Swift Dodge v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Thomas v. WrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.