Legal Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Keith

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 2001No. 00-2250PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

After respondent, Jeffrey Carl Keith, then of Parma, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0007885, was convicted on six felony counts, we suspended him, effective July 13, 1995, indefinitely from the practice of law in Ohio pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(5)(A)(3). In re Keith (1995), 72 Ohio St.3d 1555, 651 N.E.2d 1013. On August 7, 1995, relator, Office of Disciplinary Counsel, filed a complaint charging that respondent’s convictions showed that he violated DR 1-102(A)(3) (a lawyer shall not engage in illegal conduct involving moral turpitude), 1-102(A)(4) (a lawyer shall not engage in conduct…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. KeithOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  2. In re KeithOhio Supreme Court · 1995

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Toledo Bar Ass'n v. NellerOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State ex rel. Counsel for Discipline v. JanousekNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. KeithOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  4. STATE EX REL. COUNSEL FOR DISC. v. JanousekNebraska Supreme Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API