Legal Opinion
Motley v. Smith
District Court, E.D. California
Decided July 6, 2020No. 1:15-cv-00905Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PAMELA MOTLEY, et al., No. 1:15-cv-00905-DAD-BAM 12 Plaintiffs, 13 v. ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO TRIFURCATE TRIAL AND 14 THE CITY OF FRESNO, CALIFORNIA, FOR LIMITED REOPENING OF et al., DISCOVERY 15 Defendants. (Doc. No. 162) 16 17 This matter is before the court on the motion to trifurcate and for limited reopening of 18 discovery filed on behalf of defendants the City of Fresno, California (“the City”) and five 19 individual officers employed by the City (“the Officers”) (collectively,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- City of Los Angeles v. HellerSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,925 Arthur Young & Company v. United States District Court, Etc., Albert Kaufman, Real Parties in InterestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Quintanilla v. City of DowneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- American Thermos Products Co. v. Aladdin Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1962
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.