Legal Opinion

Smith v. Uhler

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 13, 2024No. 7:23-cv-07842Unknown

1Opinion

BME. 2 BL □□□ SEO UE UE VV 2 ev pt Abi CO Che VED Vs thi SVU. ANNO PERN BE wo SPAS EASEL □□□ □□□□ Petition as time-barred is granted and the Petition is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of Court is respectfully to terminate the pending motion, (ECF No. 11), and close the case. Because Petitioner has not made a UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, a SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK certificate of appealability will not issue. See 28 U.S.C. 2252(c). 5 5-5-5 5-5 5 5-5-5 5-5 5 XX SINCERE SMITH, ED 8/13/24 Petitioner, CATHY SEIBEL,USDJ. 23 Civ.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. McQuiggin v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Holland v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API