Legal Opinion
Chapman v. QuikTrip Corporation
District Court, N.D. Texas
Decided August 31, 2022No. 3:21-cv-02314Unknown
1Opinion
United States District Court NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS ; DALLAS DIVISION KEVIN CHAPMAN § v. : CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:21-CV-2314-S QUIKTRIP CORPORATION ORDER, MEMORANDUM OPINION, CERTIFICATE pol eee hte Before the Court is Defendant QuikTrip’s Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Affidavits Served Pursuant to Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code Section 18.001 (“Motion”) [ECF No. 15], Brief in Support of Defendant’s Motion [ECF No. 16], and Appendix in Support of Defendant’s Motion [ECF No. 17]. Plaintiff Kevin Chapman has not filed a response to the Motion. For the following reasons, the Court DENIES…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Byrd v. Blue Ridge Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Burlington Northern Railroad v. WoodsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Tom L. Ashlock v. Conseco Services, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.