Waas v. Day
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Turner, Commissioner
Affirming.
Appellant filed his action for damages. The trial court sustained a demurrer to his petition, and the correctness of that ruling is the only question involved.
*470It is alleged that on the 7th of December, 1920, a “run” was in progress on the appellee bank, and its depositors were in large numbers withdrawing their money therefrom; that on that day while the run was in progress and the depositors were withdrawing their money, Elam, the cashier of the institution, who was also a stockholder and director therein, summoned plaintiff to come to the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Salsedo v. PalmerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
- Sydnor v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906
- Stevens v. SteadmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
3Cited by6 opinions
- City of Belen v. HarrellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1979
- State Ex Rel. Richardson v. EdgeworthMississippi Supreme Court · 1968
- Lawson's Administrator v. BrandenburgCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
- Ray's Adm'r v. Standard Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
- Harrell v. City of BelenNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.