Legal Opinion

Waas v. Day

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided December 21, 1923PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Turner, Commissioner

Affirming.

Appellant filed his action for damages. The trial court sustained a demurrer to his petition, and the correctness of that ruling is the only question involved.

*470It is alleged that on the 7th of December, 1920, a “run” was in progress on the appellee bank, and its depositors were in large numbers withdrawing their money therefrom; that on that day while the run was in progress and the depositors were withdrawing their money, Elam, the cashier of the institution, who was also a stockholder and director therein, summoned plaintiff to come to the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Salsedo v. PalmerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
  2. Sydnor v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906
  3. Stevens v. SteadmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. City of Belen v. HarrellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1979
  2. State Ex Rel. Richardson v. EdgeworthMississippi Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Lawson's Administrator v. BrandenburgCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  4. Ray's Adm'r v. Standard Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  5. Harrell v. City of BelenNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API