Legal Opinion

Booth v. City of Rochester

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 15, 1939PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment and order reversed on the law and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. Memorandum: Under the definition of the statute, a police automobile is a vehicle but not a motor vehicle. (Vehicle & Traffic Law, art. 1, § 2, subds. 7, 8.) The court read to the jury the provisions of subdivision 1-a of section 56 and the relative portions of sections 58 and 67 of the Vehicle and Traffic *850Law and charged the jury in substance that a violation of these provisions was negligence itself. These provisions do not relate to police vehicles, hence it was prejudicial error…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rivera v. W. & R. Service Station, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
  2. Kazales v. Minto Leasing, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  3. Lederman v. KavanaughNew York Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Uliaszek v. BuczkowskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API