Legal Opinion

Doe v. Dunning

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1976No. 43907PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrachtenbach, J.

Plaintiff1 seeks a certified copy of the record of birth, a conventional birth certificate, for her child who was born out of wedlock. With the concurrence of the child’s father, the child was given the mother’s surname. Named as defendants are those persons responsible for administrating the issuance of certificates of birth. In a declaratory judgment action, the trial court ordered the issuance of a conventional birth certificate to plaintiff. In so ordering, the trial court declared that the defendants are required to issue upon request conventional birth certificates to all applicants,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stuart v. Board of Supervisors of ElectionsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
  2. State, Ex Rel. Krupa v. GreenOhio Court of Appeals · 1961
  3. Dunn v. PalermoTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Custer v. BonadiesConnecticut Superior Court · 1974
  5. People ex rel. Rago v. LipskyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1945

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Sneed v. SneedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
  2. Rice v. Dept. of Health & RehabilitativeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  3. Secretary of the Commonwealth v. City Clerk of LowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  4. Donald J. v. Evna M.California Court of Appeal · 1978
  5. John Doe G v. Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API