Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Sapienza v. Hayashi

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1976No. 6308PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

This case is before us on a petition by the City Prosecutor of the City and County of Honolulu and his deputies, for a writ of prohibition directed against the Attorney General and the Honorable Yoshimi Hayashi, Judge of the Circuit Court of the First Circuit, seeking to enjoin them from enforcing the court’s order, dated July 29,1976, wherein the court, based upon an evidentiary hearing on a motion for the petitioners’ disqualification, ruled that “City Prosecutor Maurice Sapienza, or any deputy, or any special deputy, or any assistant attorney, or any special attorney, or any other…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hull v. Celanese Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  2. Pirillo v. PirilloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. In Re Matter of Seymour A. Gopman. United States of America v. Seymour A. GopmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  4. Fox v. ShapiroNew York Supreme Court · 1975
  5. People v. RuppNew York Supreme Court · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Gannett Pacific Corp. v. RichardsonHawaii Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Honolulu Advertiser, Inc. v. TakaoHawaii Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Lussier v. Mau-Van Development, Inc. IHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. State v. RodriguesHawaii Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State v. MonizHawaii Supreme Court · 1987

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API