Anderson v. Martin
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion
On Motion for Rehearing.
2Per curiam
Appellee, Earl Martin, has filed a lengthy motion for a rehearing. We think our original opinion is clear, well supported by the record and properly disposes of the matters presented. However, there may be a need for some clarification.
In his motion for rehearing appel-lee has lost sight of the general rule so often announced by our courts to the effect that technical rules of practice and procedure are of little importance in determining issues concerning the custody of a child. The welfare and best interest of the child are the paramount questions to be determined.…
3Cases cited9 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Wood v. DeatonTexas Supreme Court · 1900
- Martin v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
- Conley v. St. JacquesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
- Mills v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
- Dickson v. McLaughlanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.