Legal Opinion

Harrington v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 4, 1934No. 4848Published

1Opinion of the Court

MILLS, Judge.

Plaintiff is appealing from a judgment rejecting his demand for 400 weeks’ compensation at $13.50 per week for disability resulting from a hernia claimed to have been caused by the strain of moving a heavy sink in the course of his employment by defendant.

Defendant denies the occurrence of any accidental injury and also that it is engaged in a hazardous business within the meaning of the Workmen’s Compensation Act (No. 20 of 1914, as amended).

The. lower court decided the case adversely to plaintiff on the legal issue in a well-considered written opinion. We prefer, without…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cordray v. Standard Oil Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1928
  2. State v. NormentSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1838
  3. Cripps v. Grant Timber & Mfg. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. Curry v. Ohio Oil Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. Hart v. Swift & Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API