Legal Opinion

Syracuse Mortgage Corp. v. Kepler

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1923PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCheney, J.

This action is brought to recover a judgment against the two defendants upon the theory that they were partners when the liability was incurred. The defendant Jesse S. Kepler has answered denying the copartnership. Defendant Milton O. Kepler has not answered, but is in default. Plaintiff has served notice for the examination of defendant Milton O. Kepler before trial, pursuant to sections 288 and 290 of the Civil Practice Act, the notice designating, among other matters upon which said defendant was to be examined, whether or not, the defendants Jesse S. Kepler and Milton O. Kepler were…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Buehler v. BushAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  2. Welsh v. Cowles Shipyard Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Reynolds Securities, Inc. v. Underwriters Bank & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Lake Minnewaska Mountain Houses, Inc. v. SmileyNew York Supreme Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API