Sitnick v. Travelers Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Issues of fact exist as to the reasonableness of plaintiff homeowner’s proffered excuse for providing late notice of claim, i.e., that he was unaware that the policies covering his New York home also provided coverage for an incident that occurred at a restaurant in New Jersey in which a third party claims to have suffered personal injury at the hands of plaintiff homeowner’s minor son. Two other Departments have reached the same conclusion in similar circumstances (see Seemann v Sterling Ins. Co., 267 AD2d 677 [1999]; Padavan v Clemente, 43 AD2d 729 [1973]). Here, as in Seemann, plaintiff…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Padavan v. ClementeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
- Seemann v. Sterling InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
3Cited by2 opinions
- Albano-Plotkin v. Travelers InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Albano-Plotkin v. Travelers InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012