Koenig v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
PEARSON, Judge.
The appellant was found guilty upon a two-count information after a non-jury trial. Count one charged the appellant with willfully destroying or damaging telephone equipment in violation of § 822.10, Fla.Stat., F.S.A. Count two charged him with possession of burglarious tools in violation of § 810.06, Fla.Stat., F.S.A. The appellant urges that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the convictions.
While patrolling in an unmarked automobile during the early morning hours, a police officer of the City of Hialeah observed a person in a telephone booth. The telephone in the booth…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mayo v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
- Chason v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
- Dedge v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1937
3Cited by4 opinions
- Betancourt v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
- Delgado v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
- In the Interest of P. G.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
- T.L.S. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999