Legal Opinion

State v. Aenspacker

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided April 8, 1912No. 19,270PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Criminal District Court, Parish of Orleans; Frank D. Chretien, Judge. Samuel Aenspacker was convicted of perjury, and appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtProvo Sty, J.

The accused was convicted of perjury, and has appealed. The perjury is charged to have been committed in the course of the trial of the case of State v. Whitaker in the criminal district court of this city.

The accused demurred to the information on the ground that it did not show on its face that the court had jurisdiction in the Whitaker Case.

[1] The information alleges that the accused committed the perjury in question on *719the trial of an information “wherein the said Whitaker was charged with the crime against nature in and upon one Angelina Brooks, of which said cause the said court had…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. McCrocklinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1912
  2. People v. CarrollCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
  3. State v. FaheySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1883
  4. State v. FulfordSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1881

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. HaddadSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1952
  2. State v. HoneycuttSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1950
  3. State v. LebleuSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1943
  4. State v. GainesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1953
  5. State v. LecompteSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1947

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API