Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Wean

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 26, 1983No. Appeal, No. 2491 C.D. 1982PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Craig,

In this zoning case, petitioners Daniel Thompson, Richard Gaier and the Shadyside Action Coalition appeal from an Allegheny County Common Pleas Court order affirming a decision of the Pittsburgh Zoning Board of Adjustment which granted a variance to the respondent, Carolyn Wean.

*110We must determine whether an earlier proceeding involving the subject property operates as res judicata to bar the present action, and if not, whether the zoning board abused its discretion or committed an error of law by granting the variance.1

The property involved in this appeal is located at…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Schubach v. SilverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Schubach v. SilverCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Golla v. Hopewell Township Board of SupervisorsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Botula v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Sisko v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Church of Saviour v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Namcorp, Inc. v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Sariano v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Cricklewood Hill Realty Associates v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API