Rhoton v. Woolford
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.
The subject matter of this suit is a promissory note of one J. M. Murphy for $300, payable to defendant, Rhoton, and by him indorsed in blank to plaintiff, Woolford, for a valuable consideration, before maturity. The note is set out in the complaint, with apt allegations of its indorsement to plaintiff, the amount due thereon, and demand of defendant for payment.
The defendant, without demurring, answered the complaint and admitted that he sold and assigned the note to plaintiff for a valuable consideration, and that plaintiff was the owner and holder thereof; alleged that the note was secured…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Kinsel v. BallouCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Carver v. SteeleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
3Cited by7 opinions
- Jeppesen v. Rexburg State BankIdaho Supreme Court · 1936
- Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance v. LentzArizona Supreme Court · 1932
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Alfalfa Seed & Lumber Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1931
- Coulter v. StewartArizona Supreme Court · 1963
- Young v. CarrArizona Supreme Court · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.