Legal Opinion

Doyle v. Corey

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 25, 1898PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Bill in EQUITY, filed October 20,1896, in the Superior Court, by the administratrix of the estate of James Doyle, to redeem certain land in Boston from a mortgage. At the hearing, a decree was entered for the plaintiff; and the defendant appealed to this court. The facts material to the point decided appear in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.

The decree which was entered is quite informal, and is substantially defective in not specifying the time within which the payment is to be made, or what shall be done in case of failure to make payment at a certain time.* It fixes the sum *338to be paid at $960.63. There is nothing whatever to show how the sum is arrived at, except as it might perhaps be picked out from the evidence, all of which is before us. The defendant alone appeals from the decree. The principal question presented is, whether on the evidence the court was warranted in finding that the plaintiff is entitled to be allowed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Murphy v. BarnardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
  2. Lovell v. WilliamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
  3. Noble v. NugentIllinois Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Dunn v. . HornbeckNew York Court of Appeals · 1878

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. East Hampton Bank & Trust Co. v. CollinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  2. Brown v. Guaranty Securities Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1924
  3. Ulen v. KnecttleWyoming Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Union Trust Co. v. McKeonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
  5. McCullough v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API