Legal Opinion

(SS)Williamson v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, E.D. California

Decided September 11, 2020No. 2:18-cv-02304Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KATHERINE E. WILLIAMSON, No. 2:18-cv-02304 KJM CKD 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social 18 Security (“Commissioner”) denying an application for benefits under Title II of the Social 19 Security Act (“Act”). 20 On November 5, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, 21 F&Rs, ECF No. 15, which contained notice to the parties that any objections…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Bowen v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Sergey Spitsyn v. Robert Moore, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. Miguel GONZALEZ, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Louis W. SULLIVAN, Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services, Defendant/AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  5. Brian David Frye v. R. Hickman, Warden Attorney General of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API