Legal Opinion

Thoren v. Cockburn

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided January 15, 1914Published

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the City Court of the city of New York rendered in favor of the plaintiff.

1Opinion of the CourtGuy, J.

The plaintiff sues to recover from defendant moneys which she alleges were erroneously paid defendant as an award for certain parcels of land taken by the city of New York in condemnation proceedings for the opening of Baychester avenue in the borough of The Bronx.

The report of the commissioners in said proceedings, awarding to the defendant, as the owner of damage Nos. 110, 111, 112 and 113, the value of said parcels, was duly confirmed by order of the Supreme Court entered on the 6th day of July, 1912, and the amount thereof paid to defendant.

Plaintiff brings suit under section 1002 of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Utter v. . RichmondNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. King v. . Mayor, Etc., of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
  3. Matter of City of RochesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. Magee v. . City of BrooklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  5. In re Mayor, Aldermen, & Commonalty of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API