Legal Opinion

Carson v. Fulbright

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 3, 1909No. 16,138PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from Clark district court; Gordon L. Finley, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Benson, J.:

The action was to foreclose a mortgage made by John Finley and wife and assigned to the plaintiff, C, W. Carson. The defendant, Jay Fulbright, was in possession of the mortgaged premises claiming title in fee, under a tax deed in regular form recorded more than five years before the suit was commenced. Judgment was rendered for the defendant.

Under section 141 of the tax law (Gen. Stat. 1901, § 7680) the tax deed is invulnerable to this attack unless the facts of this case distinguish it from many others decided by this court protecting the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fort Scott Building & Loan Ass'n v. Palatine InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  2. Shrigley v. BlackSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  3. Rand v. Fort Scott, Wichita & Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1892
  4. Gibson v. GilmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  5. Gilman v. Stock Exchange BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. New v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  2. Jinkiaway v. FordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  3. Stith v. GidneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API